NEMO/ISK Seminar: Timothy Coombs, Social Media Infused Activism: The Advent of Private Politics

Coombs NEMOLeading US PR academic Timothy Coombs, who will be NEMO Visiting Professor at Campus Helsingborg this Autumn, argues that social media is transforming activism with its ability to target corporate reputation.

In the latest NEMO/ISK seminar, Tim gave many examples of how and why large organisations are positioning themselves to respond to activism that threatens reputation, a claim reinforced by the amount of money being spent on monitoring the online activity of stakeholders. Spending patterms suggest that the greatest perceived threat seems to comes from social networks rather than, say, blogs.

“Social media has fundamentally transformed activism. It has become part of the what they do and what they are,” he said.

Activism is sustained by the need to recruit and retain supporters, and to integrate them into the activist community. They use social media internally to sustain themselves and then externally to meet larger goals of social reform.

Activists are a unique group of stakeholders because they can be customers or employees. They see themselves as agents of change.

Campaigns often begin with claims that organisation is acting in a irresponsible manner, and such claims can do great harm to brand identity. (Volkswagen/Darth Vader).

Screen Shot 2013-05-09 at 17.05.15Traditional activism depended heavily on the news (legacy media), but this no longer the focal point for many campaigns. The media advocacy model carries an inherent risk that messages can be distorted or overlooked. To get noticed, the tactics need to be extreme, and this can overshadow and obscure the message. Sometimes, the actions themeselves work to marginalise the campaign. (ie the Battle for Seattle).

Now, social media allows activists to focus less on creating pseudo events as the focal point of activity, and their actvities can carry greater legitimacy than, say, street protest.

Reputation is an asset corporations care about and that will attract legacy media coverage. Reputation offers a leverage point, and its effectiveness increases as corporations place increasing value on repuatation.

It is also easier to sustain an online protest than a physical protest, and can be both visible and quantifiable.

Tim gave examples of successful campaigns, including the Greenpeace Detox campaign, which employed social media focus to reputation pressure points on clothing brands such as H&M, whilst at the same time making demands that they knew manufacturers could meet.

Download Tim Coombs presentation (pdf) Social Media Infused Activism Coombs

Coombs/Seminar 0

Dream of Enlightenment: Howard Nothhaft NEMO Seminar

The Dream of Enlightenment within Digital Reach, presented by Howard Nothhaft, Campus Helsingborg, NEMO/ISK Seminar, Tuesday April 9.

Foto_Nothhaft_01Developing ideas first discussed at the October 2012 NEMO Conference, Howard Nothhaft is examining notions of democracy as part of a wide-ranging and ambitious literature review that will underpin both his own explorations of the public sphere in the Web 2.0 world and provide a theoretical foundation for broader NEMO-funded studies.

As Jan Teorell suggested in his NEMO Seminar, Varieties of Democracy, defining democracy is fraught with difficulty.

Taking a cue from Manuel Castells, who argues that “there is nothing that cannot be changed by conscious, purposive social action, provided with information, and supported by legitimacy,” Howard seeks to identify comprehensive answers given by scholars, to the question whether,  for what reasons and under which conditions Western citizens can expect ICT advances to bring a more democratic society.

Most people think democracy is a good thing, and some hope that through a combination of greater access to information, moves towards greater transparency, and the increasing availability of tools for online interaction, good things will somehow grow and flourish (see Harkaway).

There are very different understandings of the form of democracy that digital media may promote, with associated differences in digital democracy rhetoric and practice. Despite this diversity, digital democracy (or e-democracy) is often talked about as though there was a general consensus about what it is.’ (Dahlberg 2011)

Howard  argued: “We all agree that democracy is wonderful, but once we move closer, it its meaning dissolves under scrutiny.” It becomes an empty signifier (Levi-Strauss), a word that has positive connotations but at centre has no meaning.

Building from Dahlberg, Howard identified and defined five Conceptualisations of Democracy:

  • Aggregative democracy: everyone has some right to choose who is in power, but power held by an elite political caste
  • Deliberative democracy: (Habermas) Everyone has a say until agreement is reached
  • Synthetic democracy: everyone has a say, but decisions passed on to experts/technocrats, which
  • Pluralist-agonistic democracy: everyone has a say, and decisions follow victory in passionate ideological debate
  • Material democracy: voices don’t matter as much as ownership of means of production (post-Marxist)

It is arguable that digital advance strengthens the potential of the Habermasian deliberative model, with consensus emerging in virtual public spheres, but critics argue that in the real world this falls apart in the face of self-interest.

Perhaps the synthetic model has closest links with strategic communication in that it somehow disengages politics from the political apparatus, in part through the actions of spin doctors and framing devices that reduce ideological conflict to technical decisions to be made by experts.

In contrast, the pluralistic model puts the focus firmly on politics, focusing on issues and attempting to cut through and move beyond the distortions of spin.

Material democracy might argue that new technology allows people to take back control, by breaking down barriers of ownership, and promoting open source models that make the state smaller.

Proponents of each models can find arguments to support the view that digital and online platforms and channels empower their cause, but Howard closed by suggesting that serious scholars were less optimistic about the the possibility of digital technologies to deliver true change than were such evangelists as Nicholas Negroponte (Being Digital etc) at the advent of web-based discourse some 15 or so years ago.

Download Howard’s presentation in pdf format: Howard Dream seminar Apr 9

Democracy/Seminar 0

Timothy Coombs to be NEMO guest professor

coombsOne of America’s leading PR academics will be guest professor at the Department of Strategic Communication at Campus Helsingborg this autumn.

Timothy Coombs, of Nicholson School of Communication at the University of Central Florida, will play a key role in NEMO research throughout a four-month stay as guest professor.

His more prominent books are Ongoing Public Relations, The Handbook of Crisis Communication (co-edited with Sherry Holladay), PR Strategy and Application (co-written with Sherry Holladay), and It’s Not Just PR (co-written with Sherry Holladay).  In total, he written, co-written, or edited ten books.

Research by Dr. Coombs has appeared in a wide range of journals include Management Communication Quarterly, Public Relations Review, Journal of Public Relations Research, Public Affairs, International Journal of Strategic Communication, Corporate Communication, and the Journal of Management Communication.  Dr. Coombs has over 40 published journal articles, 30 book chapters, and delivered over 100 academic papers.  He sits on the editorial board of ten journals and is the co-editor of Public Relations Inquiry.

Dr. Coombs has consulted with governments and businesses about crisis-related topics in the U.S., Europe, and Asia.

  • Timothy Coombs will be in Helsingborg next month, and present at the NEMO/ISK Seminar on Tuesday, May 7. His subject is: Social Media Infused Activism:  The Advent of Private Politics

 

Coombs 0

Digital democracy: How it could be….

The first chapter of Nick (@harkaway) Harkaway’s book, The Blind Giant (2012) is called Dreams and Nightmares.

He sets out to visualise a digital dream world, where everything that could possibly go well, has:

Shining healthy people move through a sunlit space filled with birds, plants and slick technology…

… in groups, they discuss politics, ethics, science and literature. They are voracious, interested in everything.

Many administrative and commercial decisions are managed from moment to moment- and very few companies or government departments are ever unavailable, at any hour of the day or night – but even now it’s easier to have a degree of scheduling so everyone has a shared sense of time – it helps social cohesion.

So midway through each afternoon, the whole society pauses in what it is doing to vote in a series of plebiscites, each individual drawing on his her own expertise or experience to answer today’s pressing questions: a perfect, ongoing participant democracy in which reason prevails, moderated by compassion and goodwill, and the strong measured centre holds sway.

Anyone doing something too engrossing to participate – be it surgery or scuba – need not vote, but frequent abstention is considered odd. No one has to vote on everything, but it is generally accepted practice to vote on issues in which you are disinterested as well as thse that directly affect you because the network of connection and consequence is such that nothing takes place in isolation.

With access to all the information in the world, both curated and raw data, people are well able to make informed choices and, through their combined intelligence, solve problems which seemed intractable to the old style of government which relied on notionally expert leaders. No one goes hungry, no one is alone, no one is unheard.

This is the happy valley, the high plateau of technological culture.

Democracy 0

Call for Project proposals

We are now looking to support a second round of research investigations and case studies that will continue to develop significant academic outputs of international standing. The research is expected to take place and be funded during 2014.

All research proposals will be judged on academic merit, their alignment with the NEMO research themes, and the degree to which they complement the existing research portfolio, particularly as expressed in work to be included in the NEMO Anthology publication.

Expected Outputs
The prime purpose of NEMO funded projects is to add to academic knowledge, and successful research proposals will clearly identify appropriate platforms for publication (usually in peer reviewed academic journals of international standing). The work should also lead to at least one chapter contribution to the proposed NEMO Anthology publication.

Researchers are expected to NEMO Conferences (October 10 and 11, 2013, and to attend regular NEMO/ISK seminars, and to contribute debate, comment and opinion here on the NEMO blog.

Researchers will be encouraged to present their work at academic conferences (crediting NEMO funding), but each application for support for conference attendance is at the discretion of the NEMO Steering Group, and will be the subject of a separate funding application.

The Application Procedure
We will welcome the submission of drafts (500 words maximum) before a deadline of Monday May 6. Feedback on drafts will be delivered early in June, and successful applications will be invited to submit a developed proposal (2,000 words maximum) no later than Monday, September 9.

Download the Call for Proposals:  NEMO 2 CfPP Apr4

 

Project Proposals 0

Manuel Castells: How political movements straddle urban space and cyberspace – video

From The Guardian:

Spanish sociologist Manuel Castells argues that the internet has altered protest movements forever. But while he says online activism can be effective, recent major political change has required boots on the ground – and the intersection between urban space and cyberspace is where to find the most interesting modern political movements

Video herehttp://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/video/2013/mar/25/manuel-castells-political-cyberspace-video

Democracy 1

Nathalie Nahai research seminar

The work of psychologist Daniel Kahneman, author of Thinking, Fast and Slow, is helping us to understand just how little conscious control we have of our actions and activities. The realisiation that much of our behaviour is determined in areas that seem to be set apart from rational control is of increasing interest to communicators, and Nathalie Nahai’s NEMO seminar gave many insights into potentially fascinating areas of study.

Here is a version of the presentation Nathalie gave to practitioners at the Marknadsföreningen i Helsingborgsregionens breakfast which touches on many of the key points from her NEMO session. (Pictures here).

Web Psychology – your roadmap to online success

Nathalie also gave a presentation to students, and here are some of their responses captured using Storify.

http://storify.com/mediations/web-psychologist-nathalie-nahai-at-nemo

 

 

 

 

Seminar 0

Questions for Web Psychologist Nathalie Nahai

As project leader of NEMO I will probably know most of the people who come along to hear Nathalie Nahai talk about Webs of Influence, but few of anyone there will know me as well as Facebook does.

According to a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and reported by the UK’s Guardian newspaper:

Facebook users are unwittingly revealing intimate secrets – including their sexual orientation, drug use and political beliefs – using only public “like” updates, according to a study of online privacy.

The research into 58,000 Facebook users in the US found that sensitive personal characteristics about people can be accurately inferred from information in the public domain.

Researchers were able to accurately infer a Facebook user’s race, IQ, sexuality, substance use, personality or political views using only a record of the subjects and items they had “liked” on Facebook – even if users had chosen not to reveal that information.

The findings shouldn’t be a surprise, but it is worth asking why we feel the need – compulsion even – to share information that we might well be quite reluctant to pass on in a face-to-face discussion.

I am sure this is one of the questions we will pose to Nathalie. After a brief introduction by me, Nathalie will give a short presentation on some aspects of her work, and pass on some of the findings revealed in her book Webs of Influence.

We will then have the opportunity for a structured discussion, looking at ways in which organisations can use insights gained from neuroscience to make their online engagement more effective, and no doubt explore some of the ethical issues that can arise from such activity.

Presenting products and services in the most attractive manner, and using psychological tricks to clinch a deal have been at the driving forces behind salesmanship and advertising, for as long as the disciplines hav been practiuced, but theer is a marked reluctance among the ‘professional’ public relations community to openly discuss neuroscience. It is somehow “cheating,” and rather too close to techniques associate with propaganda than to the managerial approach to information distribution and strategic communication. Why is this? Is it a good thing?

If you have any questions for Nathalie, post them here…

Uncategorized 0

CiviliNation and civilised discourse

555928_507137829332285_1812437985_n-1In theory, social media should allow anyone with an internet connection the opportunity to engage in civic debate. It should enable and empower a whole range of voices to be heard, and in theory, it should take down barrier and create a level playing field, not based on economics or power hierarchies.

In reality, it takes some bravery to stand up and propose or defend an unpopular cause. In reality, some people use the (semi)anonymous nature of internet discourse to bully and abuse. Far too many people feel quite comfortable in using language and behaviour online that they would not use in a face-to-face exchange.

Here is Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia, talking about CiviliNation, a non-profit charity taking a stand against online hostility, character assassination and adult cyberbullying.

Uncategorized 0

NEMO/ISK Seminar: Nathalie Nahai, Web Psychologist

Research seminar for academic staff: 13.00, Thursday, March 14, C324

Strategic Communication is about providing information but it is also about persuasion. Communicators need to know how to craft messages in a way that alters perceptions and behaviours in a way that benefits an organisation, and they need to understand a bewildering array of channels, many of which are now online.

url-1Psychologist Nathalie Nahai, author of Webs of Influence: The Psychology of Online Persuasion (read more at Mediations), will be our guest at Campus Helsingborg on Thursday March 14. 

Nathalie’s work investigates the psychology of persuasion – why we visit certain websites, why we join social networks, why we enjoy commenting and sharing pictures, and why we choose to buy some products rather than others. Quite often the answers are not obvious, and can run against expectations.

Neuroscience is developing rapidly, and it appears we are gaining significant insights into what shapes conscious and unconscious decision-making. These lessons are of great practical value to communicators but they also highlight some serious ethical concerns. Some would argue there is a thin line between being persuasive and using ‘tricks’ to encourage people to behave in ways that are not necessarily in their best interests.

Expect a lively discussion!  Please email philip.young@isk.lu.se if you are planning to attend.

Nathalie has kindly agreed to give a lecture to students at 15.00 in Room C224 and she will also speak to practitioners at the Marknadsföreningen i Helsingborgsregionen breakfast on Friday, March 15. Spread the word!

 

Seminar 0